Editorial policy

At AlSachach, we prioritize the clarity of thought over the speed of transmission.

Sources

When an article relies on a scientific finding, a statistic, or a specific factual claim, its sources are listed at the end of the article. Original sources are preferred over second-hand summaries whenever they are available.

Evidence, interpretation, opinion

Articles try to make clear which statements are supported by evidence, which are the author’s interpretation, and which are personal opinion. Some pieces are reflections rather than research, and are written as such.

Handling Uncertainty

Where the evidence is limited or disputed, the article says so instead of sounding certain. Writing about psychology, health or money is educational and is not a substitute for advice from a qualified professional.

Corrections

If a substantive mistake is found, the article is corrected and a visible note explains what changed. Minor edits to wording are made without a note.

Asking for a correction

If you believe something is wrong, tell us which article and what the issue is.

How to reach Al Sachach

Fairness

Ideas are criticised on their merits. People are not insulted.

Editorial standards

Content is released only when it adds genuine understanding to the discourse. If it does not clarify, it does not belong on AlSachach.
  1. Accuracy Over Speed

    We rigorously fact-check every assertion. Speed is never an excuse for error or oversight in our process. The rush to publish is the enemy of the truth.

    Practical Implication: We delay publication rather than risk ambiguity.

  2. Accuracy Over Speed

    We rigorously fact-check every assertion. Speed is never an excuse for error or oversight in our process. The rush to publish is the enemy of the truth.

    Practical Implication: We delay publication rather than risk ambiguity.

  3. Intellectual Independence

    Our editorial judgment is free from external influence, commercial pressure, or political expediency. We serve the reader's intellect, not a stakeholder's interest.

    Practical Implication: We disclose all potential conflicts of interest immediately.

  4. Intellectual Independence

    Our editorial judgment is free from external influence, commercial pressure, or political expediency. We serve the reader's intellect, not a stakeholder's interest.

    Practical Implication: We disclose all potential conflicts of interest immediately.

  5. Constructive Skepticism

    We approach all claims with a healthy dose of doubt, requiring evidence commensurate with the magnitude of the statement. Skepticism is the tool we use to refine understanding.

    Practical Implication: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence before any mention.

  6. Constructive Skepticism

    We approach all claims with a healthy dose of doubt, requiring evidence commensurate with the magnitude of the statement. Skepticism is the tool we use to refine understanding.

    Practical Implication: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence before any mention.

  7. Clarity of Language

    Obscurity is not depth. We strive for precision in every sentence, avoiding jargon that alienates and vagueness that confuses.

    Practical Implication: We rewrite until the complex becomes comprehensible without losing nuance.

  8. Clarity of Language

    Obscurity is not depth. We strive for precision in every sentence, avoiding jargon that alienates and vagueness that confuses.

    Practical Implication: We rewrite until the complex becomes comprehensible without losing nuance.

  9. Proportionality

    We assign coverage based on significance, not sensation. We resist the urge to amplify trivialities for the sake of engagement.

    Practical Implication: Viral potential is never a factor in editorial selection.

  10. Proportionality

    We assign coverage based on significance, not sensation. We resist the urge to amplify trivialities for the sake of engagement.

    Practical Implication: Viral potential is never a factor in editorial selection.

  11. Enduring Value

    We aim to produce work that remains relevant. Our focus is on the structural underpinnings of events, not just the fleeting surface noise.

    Practical Implication: We prioritize long-form analysis over breaking news tickers.

  12. Enduring Value

    We aim to produce work that remains relevant. Our focus is on the structural underpinnings of events, not just the fleeting surface noise.

    Practical Implication: We prioritize long-form analysis over breaking news tickers.

  13. Clarity Over Cleverness

    We eschew wit when it comes at the expense of comprehension. Our primary duty is to inform and elucidate, not to impress with linguistic acrobatics.

    Practical Implication: Metaphor and analogy are used strictly to clarify, never to obscure.

  14. Clarity Over Cleverness

    We eschew wit when it comes at the expense of comprehension. Our primary duty is to inform and elucidate, not to impress with linguistic acrobatics.

    Practical Implication: Metaphor and analogy are used strictly to clarify, never to obscure.

  15. First-Principles Reasoning

    We dismantle complex problems to their fundamental truths rather than relying on analogy or received wisdom. We build our arguments from the ground up.

    Practical Implication: We question the premise before accepting the conclusion.

  16. First-Principles Reasoning

    We dismantle complex problems to their fundamental truths rather than relying on analogy or received wisdom. We build our arguments from the ground up.

    Practical Implication: We question the premise before accepting the conclusion.

  17. Steel-manning Arguments

    We address the strongest possible version of opposing viewpoints. Engaging with weak or misrepresented arguments serves neither the truth nor our readers.

    Practical Implication: We reconstruct opposing views charitably before critique.

  18. Steel-manning Arguments

    We address the strongest possible version of opposing viewpoints. Engaging with weak or misrepresented arguments serves neither the truth nor our readers.

    Practical Implication: We reconstruct opposing views charitably before critique.

  19. Intellectual Humility

    We acknowledge the limits of our knowledge. Where data is scarce or conclusions are tentative, we state so explicitly rather than feigning certainty.

    Practical Implication: Confidence intervals are communicated alongside conclusions.

  20. Intellectual Humility

    We acknowledge the limits of our knowledge. Where data is scarce or conclusions are tentative, we state so explicitly rather than feigning certainty.

    Practical Implication: Confidence intervals are communicated alongside conclusions.

  21. Sourcing & Verification

    Every claim of fact must be traceable to a primary source. We do not rely on secondary reporting when original documentation is available.

    Practical Implication: Hyperlinks provided always lead to original data, not interpretation.

  22. Sourcing & Verification

    Every claim of fact must be traceable to a primary source. We do not rely on secondary reporting when original documentation is available.

    Practical Implication: Hyperlinks provided always lead to original data, not interpretation.

  23. Long-term Relevance

    We write for the archive, not just the feed. Our content is designed to provide value that compounds over time, serving as a reference for future inquiry.

    Practical Implication: We evaluate article topics by their potential utility in five years.

  24. Long-term Relevance

    We write for the archive, not just the feed. Our content is designed to provide value that compounds over time, serving as a reference for future inquiry.

    Practical Implication: We evaluate article topics by their potential utility in five years.

  25. Error Correction

    When we err, we correct openly and immediately. Corrections are prominently displayed at the top of the relevant article, detailing exactly what was changed and why.

  26. Error Correction

    When we err, we correct openly and immediately. Corrections are prominently displayed at the top of the relevant article, detailing exactly what was changed and why.

  27. Attribution

    We credit sources explicitly. Anonymous sourcing is used only as a last resort when the information is vital and the source's safety is at risk, and it is always flagged to the reader.

  28. Attribution

    We credit sources explicitly. Anonymous sourcing is used only as a last resort when the information is vital and the source's safety is at risk, and it is always flagged to the reader.